31. This application [made by Hong Kong Barrister Kevin Hon, instructed by Gloria Chan & Co Solicitors, for the Defendant NAVIN KUMAR AGGARWAL] shows a lack of foundation and was badly prepared for hearing. The 3rd affirmation of the solicitor for the Defendant was filed the day before the hearing but a copy was handed up to me only on the morning of the hearing. The bundle for hearing was lodged in the afternoon before the hearing after I have already read the file. The bundle did not contain all the pertinent documents including the Injunction Order and the Plaintiff’s affidavit supporting the application for the Injunction. The skeleton submission was faxed in only in the morning 18 minutes before the hearing when there was no opportunity for me to read it...
(Source 1: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=77832&QS=%28%7BNAVIN+KUMAR+AGGARWAL%7D+%25parties%29&TP=JU)
(Source 2: http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2011/555.html)
(Source 3: http://hkremembers.blogspot.hk/2014/05/high-court-critticizied-barrister-kevin-hon-solicitor-gloria-chan-and-defendant-navin-kumar-aggarwal-for-bad-preparation.html)
(Source 2: http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2011/555.html)
(Source 3: http://hkremembers.blogspot.hk/2014/05/high-court-critticizied-barrister-kevin-hon-solicitor-gloria-chan-and-defendant-navin-kumar-aggarwal-for-bad-preparation.html)
(HCA 1061/2011 - a Decision of Hong Kong Deputy High Court Judge Queeny Au-Yeung in 2011)
沒有留言:
張貼留言