王正宇資深大律師控銀行疏忽 (Lawyer, Barrister and Senior Counsel Ching Y Wong SC Sues Bank for Negligence)

王正宇資深大律師控銀行疏忽 (Lawyer, Barrister and Senior Counsel Ching Y Wong SC Sues Bank for Negligence)

http://news.sina.com.hk/news/20130808/-2-3036519/1.html

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20130808/18369047

資深大律師王正宇偕妻入稟高院，向一間私人銀行索償，指它曾無牌從事證券或資產管理業務，並在2005至2011年銷售銀行產品、證券或金融衍生產品時疏忽，令他們蒙受損失，惟未有透露索償金額。 案件編號：HCA1447/13

Judge Doreen Le Pichon “Plainly Wrong” (郭美超法官明顯地是錯的)

Judge Doreen Le Pichon “Plainly Wrong”

http://jointarmy20130201.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/le-pichon-plainly-wrong/

Judge Doreen Le Pichon said to be “plainly wrong” in BORN CHIEF CO t/a BEIJING RESTAURANT v. TSAI, GEORGE AND ANOTHER; Reported in: [1996] 2 HKLRD 188

http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=10792&QS=%28born%2Bchief%29&TP=JU

Coram: Nazareth, V.-P., Liu and Ching, JJ.A. in Court
Date of Hearing: 12 March 1996
Date of Judgment: 10 April 1996

———————-

J U D G M E N T

———————–

Nazareth VP: -

The judge (Doreen Le Pichon) was plainly wrong in directing an inquiry to be made by a Master as to damages, and that order cannot be permitted to stand.

(G P Nazareth) (B Liu) (Charles Ching)
Vice President Justice of Appeal Justice of Appeal

Lawyer, Barrister and Senior Counsel Martin Lee SC and His Wife Sue Bank for HK$1.56 Million

李柱銘夫婦告滙豐追156萬 (Lawyer, Barrister and Senior Counsel Martin Lee SC and His Wife Sue Bank for HK$1.56 Million)

http://www.sharpdaily.hk/article/news/20130508/193688

(Sharp Daily, May 8th, 2013)

政壇元老兼資深大律師李柱銘，聲稱透過滙豐私人銀行（瑞士）投資時，對方作失實陳述及違反合約，日前偕妻入稟高等法院，要求賠償。案件涉款至少20萬美元（約156萬港元），李柱銘拒絕評論案件。

涉及投資誤導

李柱銘與妻子方綺娥是透過多年戰友何俊仁的律師行提出訴訟。李柱銘昨日對記者表示，有關投資涉及誤導，但拒絕進一步講述涉款總額等詳情。據了解，有關投資與2008年雷曼兄弟爆煲無關。根據入稟狀，李柱銘夫婦透過被告進行投資，涉及五種結構性工具（structured instruments），但被告違反合約、違反受信責任及作失實陳述，故李柱銘要求賠償。