大狀唐煒明 藏毒罰四千 - Barrister Ming Tong Fined HK$4,000 for Possession of Drugs

Counsel Ming W M Tong Convicted and Fined HK$4,000 - 大律師唐煒明藏毒罪成立罰款四千

 

(Source: http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20110803/00176_036.html)

 

對於唐煒明大律師 (Barrister Ming Tong) 會否被停牌，大律師公會執委會表示，會慎重考慮任何大律師導致定罪的行為，是否構成專業失當，並交由大律師紀律審裁組作出聆訊，再決定是否對有關大律師作出譴責、暫時吊銷執業資格、支付罰款，甚或從大律師登記冊上剔除其姓名。

 

(Source: http://www.rthk.org.hk/rthk/news/expressnews/20110802/news_20110802_55_774251.htm)

(Source: http://paper.wenweipo.com/2011/08/03/HK1108030012.htm)

Hong Kong Judge Criticized Barrister Kevin Hon, Solicitor Gloria Chan & Co, and Defendant Navin Kumar Aggarwal for Bad Preparation

31.  This application [made by Hong Kong Barrister Kevin Hon, instructed by Gloria Chan & Co Solicitors, for the Defendant NAVIN KUMAR AGGARWAL] shows a lack of foundation and was badly prepared for hearing.  The 3^rd affirmation of the solicitor for the Defendant was filed the day before the hearing but a copy was handed up to me only on the morning of the hearing.  The bundle for hearing was lodged in the afternoon before the hearing after I have already read the file.  The bundle did not contain all the pertinent documents including the Injunction Order and the Plaintiff’s affidavit supporting the application for the Injunction.  The skeleton submission was faxed in only in the morning 18 minutes before the hearing when there was no opportunity for me to read it...

(Source 1: http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/lrs/common/search/search_result_detail_frame.jsp?DIS=77832&QS=%28%7BNAVIN+KUMAR+AGGARWAL%7D+%25parties%29&TP=JU)

(Source 2: http://www.hklii.hk/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/2011/555.html)

(Source 3: http://hkremembers.blogspot.hk/2014/05/high-court-critticizied-barrister-kevin-hon-solicitor-gloria-chan-and-defendant-navin-kumar-aggarwal-for-bad-preparation.html)

(HCA 1061/2011 - a Decision of Hong Kong Deputy High Court Judge Queeny Au-Yeung in 2011)